
European Standards EN5013 & PD 6662
What are European standards for intruder alarms?
European
standards for intruder alarms are new standards being brought in to improve the installation
of intruder alarms at every stage of the process. The standards were introduced to
the UK on 1st October 2005. Despite the fact that they were introduced in October,
the standards are still going through development. This means that the UK will adopt
European standards using the scheme document PD 6662:2004 – ‘Scheme for the application
of European standards for intruder and hold-
What is
EN50131?
EN50131 replaces Old British Standards documents BS4737, BS7042 & BS6799
which cover the installation of Intruder Alarm Systems, which were withdrawn on 1st
October 2005. The most recent Version of EN50131
specifies general requirements for
Intruder and Hold-
What is PD6662?
PD 6662:2004 “Scheme for the application
of European Standards for intruder and hold-
Adopting EN50131 in the UK is only possible by complying
with PD6662:2004. PD is short for ‘Published Document’ which means that it is not
a British Standard, but is an ‘enabling document’. It contains specific UK
requirements,
which permits the UK to comply with the European Standards, in circumstances where
UK accepted practices differ from the EN Standards. Why are the standards being implemented?
The
security industry is constantly pursuing the desire to raise standards, to make equipment
more reliable and to improve customer satisfaction. These standards will put a structured
framework on ensuring an installation is fit for purpose. The new systems will provide
more facilities and flexibility and should ensure better security for our customers.
What
does this mean for the you?
It is clear that the you will benefit greatly from the
introduction of the new standards. The design, manufacturing and installation processes
will all have been improved to bring greater service, reliability and efficiency
from intruder
alarms. You should not notice many changes in the process of buying
an intruder alarm. You are advised to contact your insurer to find out which grade
of system their premises requires.
How does EN50131 differ from British Standards
?
EN50131 differs to current British Standards, in that:
• It applies to both hard-
• It requires a comprehensive ‘Risk Assessment’ to determine
system design criteria.
• It determines not only System (EN50131-
Detector (EN50131-
What is ‘Risk Assessment’ ?
Systems are required to be ‘Graded’ to reflect
the risk. A comprehensive Risk Assessment must be carried out by an approved security
system installer, and then stored securely for future reference. This is needed to
demonstrate that the system has been designed in accordance with the level of risk
determined, as specified under the new EN standards.
What are the ‘EN Grades’ within
EN50131 ?
Where a System could previously be defined simply as a ‘BS4737 Intruder
Alarm
System’ it must now be defined as an EN50131 System -
• Grade
1 is Low Risk
• Grade 2X is Low to Medium Risk (without Signalling)
• Grade 2 is Low
to Medium Risk (with Signalling)
• Grade 3 is Medium to High Risk
• Grade 4 is High
Risk
Security Systems must therefore be specified and graded according to the risk,
as part of the ‘Risk Assessment’. This must take account not only of what may be
stolen or the location and construction of the building, but also must reflect the
ability of potential intruders to bypass the technology installed.
How do the EN Grades
differ ?
Grade 1
Systems classified as Grade 1 would be most at risk from “Opportunist”
thieves. Intruders would have little knowledge of Intruder Alarm Systems, and would
be restricted to a limited range of easily available hand tools, such as hammers,
chisels, screwdrivers, pliers etc.
This Grade would typically be used for most domestic
‘Bells Only’ Systems. This grade is a lower standard than BS 4737.
Grade 2
Systems
classified as Grade 2 are likely to be targeted by criminals who will have prepared
themselves prior to a crime and will know something about the contents of a building.
Intruders would have limited knowledge of Intruder Alarm Systems, and would have
the use of a general range of tools and portable instruments such as multimeters,
bolt cutters, battery drills etc. This grade would normally account for large residential
and small commercial Systems such as Florists, Bakers, Salons and Carpet Retailers.
Grade 2 is the closest to BS 4737.
An option has also been created for lower risk
Grade 2 systems, which are not monitored. These are classified as Grade 2X.
Grade
3
Systems classified as Grade 3 are likely to be required where a buildings contents
are perceived to be high value, and criminals are likely to spend time planning an
intrusion. Intruders would be conversant with Intruder Alarm Systems and have a comprehensive
range of tools and portable electronic equipment, such as oscilloscopes, laptops,
security screwdrivers etc. Typically this grade would account for most commercial
systems such as bonded warehouses, motor garages, computer distributors, mobile phone
shops, sports shops etc.
Grade 4
Systems classified as Grade 4 will apply where security
takes precedence over all other factors. Intruders are expected to have the ability
or resource to plan an intrusion in detail and have access to a full range of tools
and equipment. This would include the means to substitute vital components in the
Intruder Alarm System. Typically this grade accounts for security systems that could
be applied to military installations, bullion and cash centres, government research
establishments etc. In these circumstances there is a high risk of organised crime
or terrorism.
What are ‘EN Classes’ ?
There are 4 ‘Environmental Classifications’ for
Components to determine where they can be installed.
Each Security System component
is given an individual ‘Environmental Classification’ by the Manufacturer.
Classes
are ;
• Class I Indoor (Temperature well maintained)
• Class II Indoor -
• Class III Outdoor -
•
Class IV Outdoor -
Class 1 applies to components
installed indoors. This is restricted to residential or office environments, where
the temperature is well maintained.
Class 2 also applies to components installed indoors.
This includes harsher environments such as shops, restaurants, storage
areas etc.
where the temperature is not well maintained
Class 3 applies to components installed
outdoors. This would be where there is some degree of shelter from weather.
Class
4 also applies to components installed outdoors This includes harsher unsheltered
environments, with full exposure to weather.
Access Levels
EN 50131 introduces the
new concept of ‘Access levels’ for Intruder Alarm Systems.
This should not be confused
with ‘User Authorities’. There are 4 Access Levels which determine who can operate
the system.
Level 4 is optional.
• Access Level 1 -
• Access Level 2 -
• Access Level 3 -
• Access Level 4 -
• Intruder and Hold-
• Tamper -
• Mains Failure
-
• Fault (other than Mains
Failure) -
Except Grade 4 which
requires a Level 3 (Engineer) Reset. An Engineer Reset can still be performed via
a ‘Managed Reset’. Entry & Exit Routes (DD243:2004 Compliance) The arrangement of
Entry and Exit routes should be in accordance with DD243:2004.
When Setting or Unsetting
is carried out in two stages, the distance between the two points should be as short
as possible e.g. Initiation on Control unit or keypad, and completion at final door.
Detectors on the Entry / Exit route(s) which are activated during Setting and Unsetting
should not create an alarm. Setting
• Setting may be initiated within the supervised
premises and completed outside.
• The entire Setting procedure may be completed outside
using suitable PACE.
• Although Timed Setting is permitted under EN50131, it is not
permitted by DD243:2004. Timed Setting should therefore not be used if conformance
to both prEN50131-
• Audible or Visible Indication
of initiation and completion should be given. Unsetting
• Unsetting may be initiated
outside the supervised premises, and completed inside.
• The entire Unsetting procedure
may be completed outside the protected area using suitable PACE.
• If Unsetting is
completed inside the supervised area, then the CIE should be sited adjacent to the
final exit point, and out of view of unauthorised persons.• Completion of Unsetting
should require a ‘single deliberate action’ by the User to Unset. This allows confirmation
to be notified, if 2 Circuits (non ER)activate following an Entry Alarm.
• The Unsetting procedure must be completed within a maximum time of 45 seconds.
Consideration should therefore be given to the location of equipment, to enable the
user to Unset the system.
• The Entry Warning period (upon Entry Timer expiry) is
now fixed at 30 Seconds.
• Audible or Visible Indication of initiation and completion
should be given. Compliant equipment
Manufacturers have been developing equipment
compliant with the new standards for several months. Systems will be graded depending
on the level of security required for the premises. Manufacturers have developed
systems for each grade and have been educating installers on the different functions
and capabilities of each system. Installation changes Both for installers and their
customers, a number of changes will be evident both in the specification and installation
stages. A structured risk assessment process should be undertaken before deciding
on the appropriate equipment. This may include filling in a ‘Location Survey Checklist',
which will help installers determine the extent of detection needed, ensuring all
areas of significant risk are supervised. It is imperative that the grade of the
system is agreed with the customer's insurance company before installation commences,
particularly with regard to signalling types and methods of unsetting to be employed
as per DD243. Installers will have to make sure that the equipment they are buying
from their manufacturer or distributor complies
with the new standards. The main practical
change for installers is in the programming as engineers must be aware of which functions/signals
are required for each grade of system. Installers must also bear in mind when certificating
a system that the lowest grade component in any system determines the overall grade
of that installation.

